Okay guys, so since we know that we already have the new model gemini 3.7 flash, which brings to a big question: do we really need the Pro models from Google now, like Gemini 3.1 Pro? In the ongoing debate of Gemini 3.7 flash vs gemini 3.1 pro, this is a pivotal moment.
When comparing models, the gemini 3.7 flash stands out due to its advanced features.
The introduction of the gemini 3.7 flash has shifted the landscape of coding.
And what about the other Pro models we were waiting for a long time? They never got released, and now we have 3.7 Flash.
Here you can see score 56 intelligent score, better than Gemini 3.1 Pro in the Gemini 3.7 flash vs gemini 3.1 pro comparison.
With the gemini 3.7 flash, the token generation rate is unprecedented.
This pricing model for gemini 3.7 flash is revolutionary in the industry.
If you talk about the speed, it is very fast. It produced 340 tokens per second in comparison to 113 tokens with Gemini 3.1 Pro.
The gemini 3.7 flash has proven its worth in various applications, including gaming.
Many are asking whether the gemini 3.7 flash can outperform previous generations.
The gemini 3.7 flash model allows for innovative development processes.
And then if you talk about cost, it is very cheap. You can see only 0.75 per million tokens, and for Gemini 3.1 Pro it is $2 per million tokens. This makes the Gemini 3.7 flash vs gemini 3.1 pro discussion even more relevant.
So let me show you in my test. I tested for game development, coding, and website development.
Let’s see which model is the better model.
Does Flash now become good enough to beat Gemini Pro or not?
Game Development: gemini 3.7 flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Okay, so here you can see there are two games, and you guys guess which one is created using 3.1 Pro and which one is 3.7 Flash.
Let’s start from this first game.
This game is like a super basic game. You can see it, the graphics are horrible. There’s no music here.
But you can see here if I just move the player, it will cross this checkpoint, so they say checkpoint is cleared.
The same logic is applied between both the games. You got these obstacles coming here, and if you get past these obstacles, then you will pass different checkpoints. They are named after Paris.
For example, if I cross this one, I cross one checkpoint, and then the end result is to reach the Eiffel Tower.
But it looks super boring.
Developers praise the gemini 3.7 flash for its speed and efficiency.
Now let’s start this game.
This game is super interesting. It also got audio, and look, it looks seriously really, really nice.
The graphics do not look like Paris, but there are a lot of details here.
In the subscription app test, the gemini 3.7 flash showed remarkable improvements.
The gemini 3.7 flash concept has rejuvenated many traditional approaches.
Even you can see on the top here from where we are passing. We’re going from Saint-Ma to Concord.
You can see how this game looks. Chrono is there, score is there, and then you have all the buttons here.
Okay, so let me tell you.
The game on the right side is created using 3.7 Flash, where the game on the left side is created using 3.1 Pro.
Definitely Flash did a really, really good job.
Users are impressed with how the gemini 3.7 flash handles various requests.
There’s no doubt in it.
Overall, the gemini 3.7 flash has been a game changer in our tests.
It’s better in game development.
Subscription App Test : Gemini 3.7 flash vs Gemini 3.1 pro
Okay, now let’s take another example of a subscription app.
I already created multiple subscription apps on this channel using different models, so I’m really comfortable with judging which model did the better work.
Without any delay, let me tell you: on the left side it is 3.1 Pro, and on the right side it is 3.7 Flash.
Now you must be saying, okay, 3.7 Flash looks much better. There are more options here, and then on the left side there are not many options.
So let me bring you one very important point here.
On the left side, 3.1 Pro did everything what I asked it for.
It did not add anything special.
It did not add too many things on this app.
Where on 3.7 Flash, it added so many things, and then everything is not even working properly.
The total is wrong and a lot of things.
If you haven’t watched my full video about 3.7 Flash review, you can check and watch that video so you will know how bad this model is 3.7 Flash or how good this model is 3.7 Flash.
Comparing the Dashboards
If you compare, let me show you the dashboard for both the apps.
This is the dashboard.
All these things like monthly budget, yearly prediction, active services — I didn’t ask to create all these things.
I just asked the same thing here: create a subscription app where we can import the subscription using image OCR and also using Excel.
This was not working properly in 3.7 Flash, but it added a lot of things here.
If you click the subscription page here, you can see this shows quick add and then you can see all the things here.
Here it added only subscription, but we have multiple options. We can edit this thing, we can mark renew, pause, duplicate, and delete this subscription.
Here we don’t have all these options. We only have the option to delete the subscription, which works really well.
If you click on this, you cannot really see what are the details and everything. Not really working properly.
OCR Test
OCR works really, really nice here.
I tested with 3.1 Pro.
If I import an image here, it will import the image properly. Then you can see the image is imported here, confirm and add, and then the subscription is added here.
In case of adding subscription here using image, let’s see what happens.
I selected the image. It is importing, scanning and parsing receipt with OCR AI.
Let’s see if it works or not.
Okay, it works.
It added even more details, and you can click on add to subscription.
They both work very, very well.
Now you can see we have two subscriptions here.
It works really nice.
It does not have analytics because I never asked it for, but it is added by Gemini 3.7 Flash.
Looking ahead, the gemini 3.7 flash will likely evolve even further.
And then calendar is another feature which I never asked, but it is added.
Do You Really Want All These Extra Features?
So now we have a big question to think here.
Do you think this is a good app or this is a good app?
Because when you’re developing a real app, you don’t want unnecessary things coming to your app.
In conclusion, the gemini 3.7 flash has established itself as a leader.
If you’re vibe coding, yes, you are a coder, you have no idea about planning of an app, what you really want to see on the app, and you just want to test things, I think then this model is better because there it gives you an idea about what else could be added here.
Many users report that the gemini 3.7 flash has improved their workflow.
The gemini 3.7 flash also offers unique customization options.
So it’s just fine for not very serious tasks.
Choose the gemini 3.7 flash for its seamless integration capabilities.
The gemini 3.7 flash has received positive feedback from beta testers.
But here, I think I prefer this one.
This is more like when you create an app or you code using 5.6 Sol, OpenAI models, or with Claude.
This is more like that kind of app development.
Where this is like they got a lot of different templates and stuff, so everything they just throw on you — all the features this model knows about that particular app, about that system you ask it for.
Okay, this is the second example.
Let me know what do you think.
For me, I think 3.1 Pro worked better, and the things are working really nice with 3.1 Pro, where I have problems with 3.7 Flash.
So that’s my review for coding.
Future updates for gemini 3.7 flash promise even more features.
The community around gemini 3.7 flash is growing rapidly.
For long reasoning tasks, I think 3.1 Pro is still better in my initial test.
Let me know if you tested enough, tested more, and then what do you think about it.
Website Recreated Using One Screenshot
Okay, now this is the example of a website we recreated using one screenshot.
On the right, website created by 3.7 Flash.
On the left side, created by 3.1 Pro.
Let me also show you the real website.
So this is the real website. You can see here this is how it looks like.
Here you can see on the right is the reference website we gave 3.7 Flash and 3.1 Pro to create.
Responsive Design
Let me tell you, for example, you can see 3.7 Flash is very bad with responsive view.
Overall, many creators prefer the gemini 3.7 flash for its versatility.
Many agree that gemini 3.7 flash is the future of app development.
This is why the gemini 3.7 flash will continue to be popular.
If you refresh, the header is really messed up.
In short, the gemini 3.7 flash sets a new standard for performance.
So it did not take care of the website being responsive.
3.7 Flash did this job, and even a lot of things here.
People are excited about what the gemini 3.7 flash can do next.
In contrast, the gemini 3.7 flash outpaces older models significantly.
My question is: you can see here both these models did not take care of what is being given in the screenshot.
You can see here this is a totally different way.
They kept the logo, but everything else is totally different.
It did not respect the icons, the things what are produced in the screenshot.
This is the reference website, and here they just added their own items.
3.7 Flash Did Better in Some Sections
If we just go to the next section here, you will see that they did a very similar job.
I would say 3.7 Flash did a better job here. ( it is built on Gemini 3.6 – check fill review here )
3.1 Pro is not that great.
It did not send the real design we gave it to reproduce.
So this, I would say, 3.7 Flash performed better.
And then if we go to the next section, we can see 3.7 Flash did a good job.
3.1 did not do a really good job.
Most of the things were done better with 3.7 Flash.
Definitely better.
One Small Thing I Noticed in the Footer
Notice one small thing here, which is the footer, which I thought is really a big thing.
For example, here in 3.7 Flash it added an email newsletter field which does not exist on the real website.
It just says “subscribe to the newsletter.”
This thing is kept and honored by the 3.1 Pro.
So what I can see here, 3.1 Pro is doing a lot of nice things. It is noticing more details, but it is not really able to produce the better results.
There are multiple things I noticed done by 3.1 Pro better.
Because 3.7 Flash is good with the results, but it’s not as good with reasoning.
Gemini 3.7 Flash or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
So in my initial test, I found out 3.7 Flash produces better results, but 3.1 Pro still takes care of a lot of subtle things.
Let me know what do you think about this.
Do you think 3.1 Pro is better or 3.7 Flash is better?
And when will we have the next Pro model from the Gemini team?
Try Gemini yourself – https://gemini.google.com/
Watch full Video above to see comparision betweek Gemini 3.7 flash vs Gemini 3.1 pro.
Also if you want to know which AI is best for cloning a website using just screenshot, Watch this video here.