So apart from the tokens, there are 10 major Misleading Claims / Misinformation people are rarely informed. They are so misleading and almost made 20k+ people buy a product that is not even close to the free AI tools available in the market.
Proof of my Finding – After 1 week of research and fact-checking, I made this video. If someone wants to see the proofs of the following things, I am mentioning them here – https://youtu.be/UyflIDT2c_E
(I provided all the official links from Open AI, google )
1) Misleading marketing claims
The platform overhypes its capabilities, making it sound superior to free AI tools when in reality, it is not. Even free AI tools provide access to GPT 5 and GPT 5 mini after the GPT 5 limit is exhausted.
Similarly, Gemini Flash 2.5 is available free to the public after the Gemini 2.5 Pro limit is exhausted.
2) Lack of unique features
Features like “prompt improvement” (spelling and grammar corrections) are marketed as special but are already standard and free in competing tools.
They exaggerate the Magic Button, which is totally useless these days as all AI can understand questions with spelling mistakes.
Voice communication does not seem to be available. Transcribe is available but no voice chat featur
And what a stupid thing to convert the user language to English, which is presented as a good thing during the video, but it totally defeats the purpose of communicating in native languages. (Later in the Launch Video he mentioned that the local languages will be implemented in future.)
3) Missing core functionalities
Important options such as proper advanced reasoning, deep research modes, and file/image management in projects are missing in AI Fiesta but are available in free alternatives.
Grok, Perplexity, and Claude have so many advanced features which are completely missing. Then how can you claim it is providing some value?
4) Confusing multi-chat feature
Switching between AI models doesn’t preserve context, leading to user confusion rather than helping productivity. I did the demo in the video.
If you ask all the AIs the capital of China, the answer is Beijing. Then just talk to one of the AIs and ask what is the capital of India, the answer is Delhi. Then ask all the AIs – “name of the president.”
The one we talked to last will give the name of the Indian president, and the others will give the name of the Chinese president.
Now imagine this level of errors on serious research, which is totally against the advertisement of AI Fiesta.
5) Unjustified pricing comparison
The claim of “saving $110 for $12/month” is misleading because the comparison is not accurate or fair to what’s offered for free elsewhere.
AI Fiesta offers access to GPT 5 API only, which is nowhere close to the functionality and features provided by the free AI platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, and Claude.
6) Weak fact-checking
AI Fiesta poorly provides sources or references for answers, making it unreliable for verifying facts.
If you compare with any free tools, they are significantly better in fact-checking compared to AI Fiesta. I showed that also in the video I posted on youtube.
7) Inferior image generation/Model not mentioned
Users don’t know which model is being used, and the outputs are worse than those available for free. As GPT 5 API does not provide image output, DALL·E is used to generate images through GPT 1.
The DALL·E API costs 0.04 USD to create one image via API. No mention is made of the image limits.
Also, the API tokens for GPT 5 and images are different.
8) Poor user experience/UI issues (Migraine Complaints)
The user interface is cramped and might cause some users to report eye strain and migraines (this is what their support told me during a call of more than 1 hour).
Changes like dark mode came only after complaints. This is something very serious and needs to be verified with a medical professional and related authorities.
Even their support staff also mentioned that he faces this issue while using the AI Fiesta platform.
9) Not competitive with free tools
Free platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Grok provide superior, more transparent, and referenced answers, while AI Fiesta delivers less for a paid subscription.
One great example would be AUTO-selecting APIs. How would a user know which API they need? It is impossible for anyone to select the API best suited manually.
10) 3 million token claim (Reality 750000 Premium tokens)
Well, there are only 750,000 GPT 5, Gemini Pro, or any other premium API tokens. So writing 3 million tokens is very manipulative.
They said in a follow-up video that GPT 5 mini, GPT 5 nano, and other standard APIs (which are the same APIs you get in free tools after the free limit of the best models is exhausted).
So why would someone come to AI Fiesta and pay for GPT 5 mini, GPT 5 nano, GPT 4.1, Gemini Flash 2.5, and other APIs which are available for free?
Hope we can have a civilized discussion on this. Please don’t use any bad words against him or anyone. We can Question and discuss things without using bad words and grow together as a civilized society.
Let me know what do you guys think. I may be wrongto, so I welcome you all for debate and learning.
Refrences & Official Document from OpenAI and Google Deepmind
🚀 GPT-5 access in Free Tier: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/11909943-gpt-5-in-chatgpt#h_4699b07591
📝 Compare GPT Models: https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/compare
🤖 Gemini Pro models available for free: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing
🧠 Using API with reasoning: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/latest-model#minimal-reasoning-effort
🎨 Image Generation API: https://openai.com/index/image-generation-api/
🎨 Image Generation Docs: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/image-generation/
🎬 AI Fiesta Official Videos:
▶️ Main Video: https://youtu.be/V-maA961SDE?si=AVVV_eGb8ii7q4Ux
▶️ Second Video: https://youtu.be/r8kdMGleCVQ?si=vOfaHyH047cGy0U1